Shill Risk · 0-100 score · 9 signal axes · 6 red-flag toggles

Shill Bid Detector

Before you raise your bid, score the auction. The detector combines top-bidder share, account age, bid timing, reserve behavior, feedback visibility, cross-listing pattern, retraction history, and price-vs-FMV into a 0-100 shill risk score with a verdict and next-step playbook.

Shill Risk Score
6
/ 100
CLEAN
No meaningful shill signal. Bid as you would with any normal auction.
CleanNormalSuspiciousLikely Shill
Additional red-flag toggles
Contribution breakdown
Top bidder placed 40-60% of bids+4
Venue: eBay auction+0
Price: Current price near FMV+0
Top bidder age: 1-3 years old, real history-2
No cross-listing pattern observed-2
No retracted bids-2
Timing: Bids spread steadily across auction window-3
Reserve: Reserve met organically in natural bidding-3
Top bidder has public feedback + history-4
Baseline+18
Total (clamped 0-100)6
What to do next
  • →Signals look clean. Bid your ceiling once and do not re-bid if outbid — that is still the defense against any missed signal.
Not legal or financial advice. This tool summarizes publicly observable bidding signals into a heuristic score. Proof of shill bidding requires platform-level audit of IP, account linkage, and bid ledgers. Report suspected shill activity to the platform rather than pursuing the listing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is shill bidding?▼
Shill bidding is when a seller (or a confederate working with the seller) places bids on the seller’s own auction to artificially inflate the price. It is a form of auction fraud. eBay, Heritage, Goldin, PWCC, Whatnot, and every major hobby venue formally ban it. The goal of shilling is either to push a real buyer past their intended ceiling, to nudge the price over a hidden reserve, or to establish a false comp that supports the seller’s other listings.
How can I spot a shill account before I bid?▼
The clearest tell is a top bidder whose feedback is private or whose account is newly created and shows activity only on this seller’s listings. Other strong signals: bid retractions during the auction, a step-ladder of 1-dollar bumps that stops exactly at the reserve, the same bidder appearing on 3 or more of the seller’s other current and past listings, and a bidder whose share of total bids on the auction is over 60%. On eBay you can click the bid history and inspect each bidder’s feedback profile; on Whatnot and Instagram Live you typically cannot, which is why those venues are higher-risk.
Why does "top bidder share of bids" matter so much?▼
In a legitimate auction, the top bidder typically places 1-3 bids: an opening bid and one or two re-bids after being outbid. When a single account has placed 60% or more of the bids on a listing, the most common explanation is that the account is being used to walk a real buyer up the bid ladder. Real buyers do not bid against themselves repeatedly — eBay’s proxy system already covers that automatically. The exception is live auctions (Whatnot, Goldin Elite), where a single bidder paddle may place many bids in the closing minute. Context matters.
What is the single biggest red flag?▼
A top bidder with PRIVATE feedback, especially combined with cross-listing history. Private feedback hides the account’s purchase patterns, and the most common reason an account hides those patterns is that the account only "buys" from one seller and returns the items. This is the core mechanic of a two-account shill setup. If the top bidder’s feedback is private AND they have been the top bidder on 2 or more of this seller’s recent listings, treat the auction as confirmed shill risk and cap your bid at your independent FMV (or walk away).
The auction has 20 bids and only 2 real-looking bidders. Is that bad?▼
Not necessarily on its own — a real bidding war between two collectors over a grail can produce 20 bids from 2 accounts. What tips it into shill territory is when one of those two accounts has private feedback, was created recently, or also appears as runner-up on the seller’s other auctions. A two-bidder war between two long-standing accounts with public history and different locations is just a real war. The detector weights both conditions together.
What should I do if the scanner flags SUSPICIOUS or LIKELY SHILL?▼
First, stop bidding. Do not place another proxy-raise that chases the inflated count. Second, document: take screenshots of the bid history, bidder feedback state, and any cross-listing evidence with timestamps. Third, report. On eBay: Report Listing → Fraudulent Activity → Shill Bidding. On Whatnot: in-app Report Host. On Goldin / Heritage / PWCC: email the house directly with your evidence. Fourth, if you still want the card, bid exactly your independent FMV one time and walk away if outbid — shill ladders collapse once the real bidder stops chasing.
Does eBay really catch shill bidders?▼
eBay runs algorithmic detection (shared device fingerprints, IP correlation, inter-account messaging patterns) and occasionally publishes enforcement actions, but most individual cases go undetected for months or years unless a buyer reports them with evidence. Auction houses like Goldin and Heritage have stronger controls because consignors have real-world contracts with financial penalties. Unmoderated venues (Facebook groups, Instagram Live, Twitter DM auctions) have effectively zero detection — this detector is most valuable precisely because platform-side enforcement is uneven.